Librenix
Headlines | Linux | Apps | Coding | BSD | Admin | News
Information for Linux System Administration 

Opinion: What Linux Needs (or doesnt need)

Up
vote
Down

There are WAY too many Linux sites in existence that all say the same exact thing! For any variation of the words linux, security, news, journal, etc ad infinitum all of the top level domains have been eaten up. Do we really need all of these opinion laden sites that say virtually the same thing and accomplish little in echoing eachother?

What are the designers of the websites for major linux distributions thinking? Of the major distribution sites the only ones that look like decent companies are RedHat and SuSE. You take a look at Slackware and it looks like something I made when I was in highschool. Debian's is a little bit better but its still lacking in its over-all look. When small to large businesses look at Linux as an alternative to Windows they are going to go research the websites. I believe RedHat is the most popular distribution in the U.S. because the site looks professional, the documentation is good, and they offer support services and not because it is the best distribution! Obviously not all of the major distributions can offer support services due to understaffing or underfunding but they can atleast spiff up their sites and at the minimum add a link to tldp.org if they are lacking in their own distribution-specific documentation. When choosing a distribution to go with people are easily swayed by first impressions... distribution websites are the display window. Would you go into a store and spend money if they had a bunch of junk displayed in the front window?

If Linux is going to make it in the business world all of the distributions need to decide on a standard package manager or make all of them available at installation. APT and RPM are the most popular however Gentoo's package management is probably the best in my opinion. If businesses run homogenous distribution networks they might be okay however ALL businesses will need to decide on a standard so if you get fired from one job and move to another you don't have to learn how to use the package manager on RedHat whereas at your old job you used Debian's APT.

Take away the complexity of the filesystem structure! I dont think I will ever quite grasp the reasoning behind having a /bin, /usr/bin, /usr/local/bin, etc. Why not put them all into /bin and set the permissions respectively on each file within the one directory? MacOSX is on the right track in the way they lay things out. On a similar note... I become more and more frustrated with Windows each day but it sure is easy to find where a program is installed c:Program FilesProgramNameProgram Files... Linux/BSD/etc oughta follow suit! They kind of got the idea with /usr/local/games but what about everything else? I shouldn't have to manually set up the directories to make it easier to navigate. I tire or find / -iname stuff. Also, file extensions need to be implemented in Linux. Sometimes I ls in huge directories and end up cat/vi'ing files until the cows come home so I can make sense of what is what. It would save a lot of time if people would throw a .txt, .sh, .bin, or a common-sensical extension on the end of programs they distribute.

Until these and all other rants that are floating through my head are resolved I don't think Linux is going to make it any time soon. (Isn't it amazing how much control (I perceive) my thoughts have over the future of Linux?)
mail this link | score:7232 | -pyoor, February 10, 2003
More articles...

Abstract Art Prints by Ray Yeargin

news headlines

Google Chromecast and the new Nexus 7

Kali Linux is now available for download

Jolidrive: Not what you think

LG acquires webOS from HP

Chromebooks vs Windows 8 certified systems

Cinnamon proposed to replace GNOME Shell as default DE on Fedora 19

The K Desktop Environment is 15

Backdoor on Verizon routers?

Tizen 2.0 Alpha code and SDK released

Ubuntu 12.10 screen shots

Android PC vs Hackberry A10

Another reason to avoid Skype on Linux

Another goes open source

FT103 SmartDisplay: 21.5-inch Android 4.0 (big) tablet

 

Firefox sidebar

Site map

Site info

News feed

Features

Login
(to post)

Search

 
Articles are owned by their authors.   © 2000-2012 Ray Yeargin